Blog- 6 Here I Am: Now and Past
PatBc
9.27.11
Bourdieu (Structures, Habitat, Practices, 1990) argues that individual agency is determined by habitus. Each of us acts out complex roles that are played out in a particular manner through a compilation of structured dispositions or traits. It is the dispositions that determine how we view and practice a particular role, many of which are designed through cultural and community interactions. I realize that many of these actions are based on meaningful connections gained through introspection, many of which are the outcomes through academic and spiritual study. Looking beyond me through others’ actions is important yet I am not quite sure if it completely defines who I am.
Reflexivity (Babcock, Reflexivity: Definitions and discriminations) truly helps to make meaning of connections with others and can alter our acceptance of others and self even through conflicting perspectives. For instance Lawless (“I was afraid someone like you…an outsider…would misunderstand”, 1992) gained new insight into defining roles of women and men. She tried desperately to make meaning of the roles and practices of the pastor as a female only to discover greater awareness of her dispositions through the conflicts of perception of the pastor and her codified society (Swartz, Habitus: A cultural Theory of Action, 1997) Lawless’ habitus deeply grounded in academic behaviors limited her understanding of Sister Anna.
No comments:
Post a Comment